http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?ts=1257756471
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ec4/e4ec436a81b69db6478ac17a7adc5b7c730df227" alt=""
1.
Academic self-efficacy, academic integration, social integration, and persistence among first-semester community college transfer students at a four-year institutionby Whorton, Susan Stanley, Ph.D., Clemson University, 2009, 182 pages; AAT 3355166
2.
A case study approach to estimating the burden of research misconduct in publicly funded medical researchby Gammon, Elizabeth, Ph.D., The University of Texas School of Public Health, 2009, 140 pages; AAT 3350093
Abstract
Mark this document
3.
Access to care in type 2 diabetes in youth: Do disparities exist between Medicaid and private insurance?by Marx, Carrie McAdam, Ph.D., University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 2009, 171 pages; AAT 3353879
Abstract
Preview (292 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
4.
A comparison of the DISC Behavior Profiling Tool and the Personal Interests, Attitudes and Values Reportby Smith, Larry A., Ph.D., Capella University, 2009, 127 pages; AAT 3359712
Abstract
Preview (123 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
5.
Administrative organizational structures: Turbulence and stability in public schoolsby Bjorkedal, Britta Jai, Ed.D., Temple University, 2009, 230 pages; AAT 3359613
Abstract
Preview (183 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
6.
Advanced techniques for multimedia search: Leveraging cues from content and structureby Kennedy, Lyndon, Ph.D., Columbia University, 2009, 185 pages; AAT 3343514
Abstract
Preview (273 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
7.
A feature structure approach for disambiguating preposition sensesby Baglodi, Venkatesh, Ph.D., Nova Southeastern University, 2009, 109 pages; AAT 3366491
Abstract
Preview (174 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
8.
A framework for analyzing biometric template aging and renewal predictionby Carls, John W., Ph.D., Air Force Institute of Technology, 2009, 171 pages; AAT 3351542
Abstract
Preview (297 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
9.
Aging with cerebral palsy: A systematic literature reviewby Snider, Anne; Johnson, Michelle, M.A., The College of St. Scholastica, 2009, 32 pages; AAT 1467565
Abstract
Preview (207 K)
Order a copy
Mark this document
10.
Aging with cerebral palsy: A systematic literature reviewby Johnson, Michelle; Snider, Anne, M.A., The College of St. Scholastica, 2009, 32 pages; AAT 1467560
Abstract
Preview (207 K)
Order a copy
reference book or reference-only book in a library is one that may only be used in the library and not borrowed from the library. Many such books are reference works (in the first sense) which are usually used only briefly or photocopied from, and therefore do not need to be borrowed. Keeping them in the library assures that they will always be available for use on demand. Other reference-only books are ones that are too valuable to permit borrowers to take them out. Reference-only items may be shelved in a reference collection located separately from circulating items or individual reference-only items may be shelved among items available for borrowing.
general book is just ordinary books,no specific,and easy to read.
4.When do you need search information from the reference collection?
Access to different information need to use different methods.If I want to know IBC knowledge, I will consult the relevant books.If I need to know in other areas of knowledge, I will read other books.
5.What type of reference collection that you like to use most? And why?
I like to use the "bing" Search for the information I need to.This is a search site.I often have the necessary knowledge and information in here,whenever I need information or when the information,I would use search engines to search,then one by one to open a search for each entry,finally found the information I need.
6.Read some book and summary 1 page.
The name:How to Build a Great Team
Author:Ros Jay
This page has said is that in a team, money and material rewards is very important for most people.
- obviously you can give them a substantial salary;they’ll want to work hard to mabe sure they hold on to a well-paid job;
- you can give them financial bonuses,or the prospect of promotion-with a concomitant rise in salary-if they perform well;
- people often respond well to suggestion schemes in which a successful idea will earn them a share in the profits it makes or the savings it accrues;
- maybe you could put them on a commission of some kind,or performance related pay(which we’ll look at later in this chapter)
It’s worth noting that when it comes to motivation,money is what is known as a “bygiene factor”.If people think they’re underpaid(usually relative to others)they are demotivated,but once they fell they are well enough paid most people won’t feel any more motivated just because you pay them more-just as dirty looks demotivate,but once they’re made clean and decent you can’t increase motivation by adding gold-plated taps.Most complaints about money are precipitated by the discovery that someone the person thought was worth less than them is actually being paid more.
Dewey Decimal Classification
The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC, also called the Dewey Decimal System) is a proprietary system of library classification developed by Melvil Dewey in 1876, and has been greatly modified and expanded through 22 major revisions, the most recent in 2004. This system organizes books on library shelves in a specific and repeatable order that makes it easy to find any book and return it to its proper place.
A designation such as Dewey 16 refers to the 16th edition of the DDC
The DDC attempts to organize all knowledge into ten main classes. The ten main classes are each further subdivided into ten divisions, and each division into ten sections, giving ten main classes, 100 divisions and 1000 sections. DDC's advantage in using decimals for its categories allows it to be both purely numerical and infinitely hierarchical. It also uses some aspects of a faceted classification scheme, combining elements from different parts of the structure to construct a number representing the subject content (often combining two subject elements with linking numbers and geographical and temporal elements) and form of an item rather than drawing upon a list containing each class and its meaning
Library of Congress Classification
The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) is a system of library classification developed by the Library of Congress. It is used by most research and academic libraries in the U.S. and several other countries. It is not to be confused with the Library of Congress Subject Headings or Library of Congress Control Number.
The classification was originally developed by Herbert Putnam in 1897, just before he assumed the librarianship of Congress. With advice from Charles Ammi Cutter, it was influenced by Cutter Expansive Classification, and the DDC, and was specially designed for the special purposes of the Library of Congress. The new system replaced a fixed location system developed by Thomas Jefferson. By the time of Putnam's departure from his post in 1939, all the classes except K (Law) and parts of B (Philosophy and Religion) were well developed. It has been criticized as lacking a sound theoretical basis; many of the classification decisions were driven by the particular practical needs of that library, rather than epistemological considerations.
Although it divides subjects into broad categories, it is essentially enumerative in nature. It provides a guide to the books actually in the library, not a classification of the world
The National Library of Medicine classification system (NLM) uses the classification scheme's unused letters W and QS–QZ. Some libraries use NLM in conjunction with LCC, eschewing LCC's R (Medicine). Others prefer to use the LCC scheme's QP-QR schedules and include Medicine R